Unit 4 — Outcome 2 SAC (argument + oral)

Part A — written analysis (indicative)

Often 40 marks for a response to a written persuasive text alongside another mode (visual / audio / audiovisual). Suggested length commonly 700–900 words.

Part B — point of view oral (indicative)

Often 20 marks, 3–5 minutes, presenting a sustained viewpoint with supporting reasons and awareness of audience.

What assessors look for

• Accurate identification of contention and line of argument.
• Analysis of how language and visuals persuade.
• Evidence integrated into reasoned discussion.
• Oral: clarity, structure, and appropriate tone for audience.

Integrating modes in Part A

Do not bolt the visual onto the end. Aim for integrated paragraphs where written and visual evidence cohere — e.g. how a headline’s diction is reinforced by the hero image’s composition. If the task supplies audio, describe sound features (pace, music, voice quality) as persuasive choices, not as background.

Oral success

• Open with contention; preview two or three reasons.
• Use one concrete example per reason (news event, school issue, local detail).
• Gesture and vary pace; avoid reading monotone from full sentences on cards.
• Finish with a sentence that answers “so what?” for your audience.

Practise written analysis

Section C tools in Study Sesh.